Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 166-171, July 2001

Comparison of the effects of two early intervention strategies on the health outcomes of malnourished hemodialysis patients☆☆★★♢♢

This study was conducted by the Research Committee of Council on Renal Nutrition of Michigan (affiliated with the National Kidney Foundation of Michigan) and was supported by a grant from the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation

Abstract 

Objective: To determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of providing oral supplementation early in the course of malnutrition for hemodialysis (HD) patients. Design: The study design consisted of 3 groups: an experimental group, a control group of patients with mild hypoalbuminemia (HA) (serum albumin [SA] = 3.5 to 3.7 g/dL), and a comparison group of patients with moderate to severe HA (SA = 2.5 to 3.4 g/dL). Setting: Ten outpatient hemodialysis centers in southeast lower Michigan. Patients: Treatment and control groups consisted of 32 HD patients with mild HA. Fourteen HD patients with moderate to severe HA comprised the comparison group. Intervention: The experimental group received diet counseling and oral supplementation, and the control group received diet counseling only. The comparison group received physician-prescribed oral supplements and dietary counseling to permit comparison of the experimental treatment with current supplementation practices. Main Outcome Measures: Differences between groups in the number of patients reaching nutritional repletion, change in SA levels at the end of the study, and follow-up periods, were tested using chi-square analysis. Analysis of variance was used to compare group differences in treatment duration to repletion and number of hospitalization days. Results: During the study period, significantly more patients reached nutritional repletion in the experimental group and control group (50% and 57%, respectively) than in the comparison group (7%). Overall, repletion occured more quickly in the experimental group (3.2 ± 1.7 months) than in the control group (3.5 ± 1.2 months), with a larger number of patients in the experimental group repleted by month 2 of the study phase. During follow-up, patients in the experimental group were far more likely to maintain nutritional repletion or continue to improve (61%) than patients in the control group (14%). Although too few patients were hospitalized to show statistical significance, there was a trend toward greater numbers of hospital days in more malnourished patients (208 days for the comparison group), followed by those with mild HA who did not receive oral supplements (107 days), and the experimental group (71 days). Conclusion: Although the sample size for this study was too small for the results to be conclusive, it appears that use of nutritional supplements early in the course of malnutrition may provide benefits such as, attaining nutritional repletion more quickly, which results in less product usage. It is also more likely that good nutritional status will be maintained after supplementation is discontinued. © 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

 

 *Greenfield Health Systems—Southeast Michigan Kidney Center, Berkley, MI

☆☆ †Greenfield Health Systems—Troy, MI

 ‡Fresenius Medical Care—Ann Arbor, MI

★★ §Greenfield Health Systems—St. Mary's, Livonia, MI, and Taylor, Taylor, MI

 ∥Greenfield Health Systems—St. Joseph, Pontiac, MI

♢♢ Address reprint requests to Barbara Wilson, MS, RD, 2230 Elmhurst, Royal Oak, MI 48073.

PII: S1051-2276(01)70030-1

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 166-171, July 2001