« Previous
Next »
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 14, Issue 1
, Pages
26-30
, January 2004
Is subjective global assessment a reliable measure of nutritional status in hemodialysis?
-
Box and whisker plot comparing composite nutritional score and SGA based on a 3-point scale (A to C) as described by Detsky.1 Values were significantly different (P < .0001; Mann-Whitney U test), but
Box and whisker plot comparing composite nutritional score and SGA based on a 3-point scale (A to C) as described by Detsky.1 Values were significantly different (P < .0001; Mann-Whitney U test), but the overlap in scores was considerable. Bold line, median value; box, 25th and 75th percentiles; thin lines, 95% confidence intervals; circles, outliers.
-
Box and whisker plot comparing composite nutritional score and SGA based on the 7-point scale recommended in the Disease Outcomes and Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines. Values were significantly diBox and whisker plot comparing composite nutritional score and SGA based on the 7-point scale recommended in the Disease Outcomes and Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines. Values were significantly different (P = .001; Kruskal Wallis test), but the overlap in scores was considerable, particularly for midrange SGA scores. Bold line, median value; box, 25th and 75th percentiles; thin lines, 95% confidence intervals; circles, outliers.
PII: S1051-2276(03)00139-0
doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2003.09.006
© 2004 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 14, Issue 1
, Pages
26-30
, January 2004

