Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 14, Issue 2 , Pages 64-71, April 2004

Outcome research, nutrition, and reverse epidemiology in maintenance dialysis patients

  • Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    • Division of Epidemiology and Public Health Nutrition, University of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Denis Fouque, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Nephrology, Department of Nephrology and Research Center for Human Nutrition, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Denis Fouque, MD, Professor of Nephrology, Department of Nephrology and Research Center for Human Nutrition, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
  • ,
  • Joel D. Kopple, MD

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Medicine and Public Health, UCLA Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract 

High morbidity and mortality of maintenance dialysis patients have led to an increase in interest in outcome research in an attempt to identify causes for this adverse outcome. It has been proposed that a substantial amount of this risk can be explained by protein energy malnutrition, chronic inflammation, or concurrent combination of both, known as malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome (MICS). Elements of overnutrition, such as increased weight or high serum cholesterol levels, which are deleterious in the general population, paradoxically are protective in dialysis patients. Conversely, a low body mass index and low serum levels of cholesterol, creatinine, and possibly homocysteine are risk factors for poor outcome in dialysis-dependent populations. These reverse or paradoxical relationships between nutritional markers and outcome are referred to as reverse epidemiology. The MICS appears to be a main contributor to the reverse epidemiology and poor outcome. Mortality is the most definitive and objective clinical outcome, whereas hospitalization and quality of life (QoL) are additional relevant but somewhat less objective outcome measures in dialysis populations. A systematic classification of outcome measures and their related epidemiologic and statistical assessment tools in dialysis patients are reviewed. The effect of MICS on outcome can be examined by epidemiologic studies that are based on large samples of dialysis patients, use multivariate techniques, and, as long as they follow strict methodologic requirements, provide an invaluable economical alternative to expensive clinical trials.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by grant #DK61162 from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (to K.K.-Z.) and a research grant from Amgen, Inc (to K.K.-Z. and J.D.K.).

PII: S1051-2276(04)00006-8

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2004.01.005

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 14, Issue 2 , Pages 64-71, April 2004