Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 191-200, October 2004

Subjective Global Assessment in chronic kidney disease: A review

  • Alison L. Steiber, PhD, RD, LD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Alison Steiber, PhD, RD, LD, Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Dental Building, Room 201, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106
  • ,
  • Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, MD, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Harbor-UCLA, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Torrance, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Donna Secker, MS, RD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Clinical Dietetics, Division of Nephrology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Maureen McCarthy, MPH, RD, CSR, LD

      Affiliations

    • McMinnville Kidney Center, McMinnville, OR, USA
  • ,
  • Ashwini Sehgal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Linda McCann, RD, LD

      Affiliations

    • Satellite Healthcare, Redwood City, CA, USA

Nutritional assessment of patients with chronic kidney disease is a vital function of health care providers. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is a tool that uses 5 components of a medical history (weight change, dietary intake, gastrointestinal symptoms, functional capacity, disease and its relation to nutritional requirements) and 3 components of a brief physical examination (signs of fat and muscle wasting, nutrition-associated alternations in fluid balance) to assess nutritional status. SGA was originally used to predict outcomes in surgical patients; however, its use has gone beyond this function and population. In chronic kidney disease patients, SGA is incorporated into the complete nutritional assessment. Validation of SGA as a screening tool for surgical patients was done by Detsky et al in 1984. Since that time, SGA has been altered by different researchers and clinicians to better meet the needs of the patients they served. Validation of the altered SGA formats has not been thoroughly done. Further work in establishing validity and reliability of each version of SGA in different patient populations should be done to enable clinicians and researchers to properly use this nutritional assessment tool.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1051-2276(04)00139-6

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2004.08.004

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 14, Issue 4 , Pages 191-200, October 2004