Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 142-147, January 2005

Causes and consequences of the reverse epidemiology of body mass index in dialysis patients

Presented at the 12th International Congress on Nutrition and Metabolism in Renal Disease, Venice and Padua, Italy, June 18 to 22, 2004.

  • Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, MD, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Institute at Harbor—UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, MD, PhD, MPH, Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, Harbor Mailbox 406, 1000 West Carson St, Torrance, CA.

A high body mass index (BMI) has been consistently shown to have a strong predictive correlation to decreased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, ie, individuals with advanced chronic kidney disease undergoing maintenance dialysis. Indeed, according to some but not all, even morbid obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m2) confers survival advantages. Among the possible causes of reverse epidemiology of BMI are the following: (1) stable hemodynamic status in obesity, (2) higher concentrations of receptors of tumor necrosis factor-α and neurohormonal alterations in obesity, (3) time discrepancies among competitive risk factors, and (4) malnutrition–inflammation complex syndrome. The reverse epidemiology of BMI may have significant clinical and public health implications because interventions that can increase body weight and BMI in dialysis patients may improve survival in these individuals. However, this hypothesis should be tested in well-designed randomized trials. Until then, it is not reasonable to advocate obesity in MHD patients. On the other hand, categorically discrediting the theory of reverse epidemiology and calling it spurious without examining the true effect of weight-gaining interventions on the survival of dialysis patients is not scientifically or ethically appropriate.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Young Investigator Award from the National Kidney Foundation and by a research grant from DaVita, Inc.

PII: S1051-2276(04)00177-3

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2004.09.020

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 142-147, January 2005