Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 47-53, January 2006

Impact of Convective Flow on Phosphorus Removal in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

  • Willy Lornoy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Willy Lornoy, MD, OLV Ziekenhuis, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Hypertension, Moorselbaan 164, 62, B 9300, Aalst, Belgium
  • ,
  • Johan De Meester, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
  • ,
  • Ignace Becaus, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
  • ,
  • Jean-Marie Billiouw, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
  • ,
  • Paul A. Van Malderen, RN

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
  • ,
  • Mia Van Pottelberge, RD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition, Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium

Objective

Hyperphosphatemia leads to increased risk of death in maintenance hemodialysis patients (MHD). This study investigated phosphorus (P) removal, P reduction rate (PRR), and P rebound, comparing on-line, high-volume hemodiafiltration in postdilution (HDF) and high-flux hemodialysis (HD) in a setting of an equal amount of produced dialysate solution in both modalities.

Methods

A total of 22 MHD patients, treated with regular 3 × 4 hours HDF weekly, were randomly dialyzed with one 4-hour session of HDF and of HD. In both modalities, an equal amount of produced dialysate solution of 800 mL/minute was used. The only variable was the fact that in HDF, 100 mL/min of this produced dialysate solution was used as replacement fluid. The other parameters were kept identical: blood flow rate, 350 mL/min; high-flux polysulfone F80 dialyzer; and 4800 E monitor, (Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany). The P removal was measured in total spent dialysate and ultrafiltrate volumes. Statistical analyses were done with the paired t-test.

Results

The mean total P removed with HDF was 1159 ± 296 mg, and 972 ± 312 mg with HD (P < .001), ie, 19% higher in HDF; PRR was significantly higher in HDF (63.3%) versus HD (58.6%) (P = .014). The mean serum P did not differ: 5.3 mg/dL in HDF and 5.2 mg/dL in HD. There was a linear correlation between serum P and P removal. With a serum P level up to 5 to 5.5 mg/dL, HDF achieved a higher P removal compared with HD. The difference gradually decreased as the serum P value increased. Above 7 mg/dL, no difference in total P removal was observed. There was a high but equal rebound percentage at 60 minutes in HDF (42%) and HD (39%) (P = .42). With HDF, no predialysis metabolic acidosis was noted.

Conclusions

Treatment with on-line HDF in postdilution resulted in a higher P removal and higher PRR compared with HD. The long-term implementation of this modality may result in a more optimal serum P control, without an increase in the number of or lengthening of the dialysis sessions.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1051-2276(05)00179-2

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2005.10.008

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 47-53, January 2006