Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 59-62, January 2006

A Simple Nutrition Screening Tool for Hemodialysis Nurses

  • Paul N. Bennett, RN, BN (Renal Cert), MHSM, MRCNA

      Affiliations

    • Registered Nurse, Master Health Service Management, and Lecturer in Nursing, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Paul N. Bennett, Faculty of Health Sciences Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001
  • ,
  • Leo Breugelmans, RN, BN (Renal Cert)

      Affiliations

    • Nurse Unit Manager of Hampstead Dialysis Centre, Adelaide, South Australia
  • ,
  • Anthony Meade, BSc, MNM

      Affiliations

    • Accredited Practicing Dietitian and Senior Renal Dietitian at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia
  • ,
  • Dee Parkhurst, RN, RM, Grad Dip Neph Ng

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Nurse Manager, Wayville Dialysis Centre, Wayville, South Australia

Objective

To assess the reliability of a nurse-performed nutrition screening tool (NST) for hemodialysis (HD) patients to identify nutritionally at-risk patients.

Design

Tool reliability assessment.

Setting and Participants

The setting was nine non-hospital private (n = 3) and public (n = 6) HD units in Australia (two rural and seven metropolitan). Participants were 112 HD patients.

Results

A total of 112 HD patients (male = 65, female = 47) from 9 non-hospital HD units in Australia (seven metropolitan and two rural) were screened with the NST and the outcome of dietitian referral compared with Standard Dietitians Assessment. The mean age of patients was 57.6 years. Overall, the NST showed a sensitivity of 0.84 (range, 0.71 to 0.94; P < .05) and a specificity of 0.9 (range, 0.82 to 0.98; P < .05). The NST was more sensitive (sensitivity, 0.93 [range, 0.87 to 0.99; P < .05]) and was more specific for men (specificity, 0.92 [range, 0.85 to 0.99; P < .05]). Specificity was very strong in metropolitan patients (specificity, 0.94 [range, 0.87 to 1.01; P < .05]).

Conclusions

The tool was more sensitive and specific than the NST previously reported by the same investigators. The tool is particularly specific in that it screens those patients not requiring dietitian intervention. The use of this tool may benefit HD units that do not have on-site or regular dietetic support to prioritize patients needing dietitian intervention.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1051-2276(05)00184-6

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2005.10.013

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 16, Issue 1 , Pages 59-62, January 2006