| | Kidney Growth During Catabolic Illness: What It Does Not Destroy Makes It Grow StrongerThe kidney undergoes hypertrophy under conditions that paradoxically cause a loss of lean body mass, such as diabetes, acidosis, and chronic kidney disease. What unique mechanisms account for kidney growth during negative nitrogen balance? One adaptation is that renal tubular cells substantially decrease protein breakdown during kidney cell growth. In this review, we discuss how acidosis and diabetes reduce protein breakdown within the kidney and the intracellular signaling pathways that may regulate protein metabolism. Our results suggest that in cell culture models and in acute diabetes, kidney cells specifically reduce protein breakdown by the lysosomal pathway of chaperone-mediated autophagy. This differs from the activation of proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in muscle in acute diabetes and uremia. A shared signaling pathway regulates protein breakdown in both kidney and skeletal muscle, namely, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase signaling. Diabetes mellitus activates signaling through this pathway in the kidney while down-regulating it in skeletal muscle. We conclude that similar signaling pathways may regulate distinct proteolytic pathways in different tissues. UNCONTROLLED DIABETES, acidosis, and uremia, conditions common in patients with chronic kidney disease, result in increased catabolism and loss of lean body mass.1 Patients with these conditions have marked muscle wasting and negative nitrogen balance. In experimental models of uncontrolled diabetes, there are marked protein losses from most organs.2 The kidney is the exception. It is remarkable that the kidney undergoes hypertrophy in many conditions that are intensely catabolic for the body as a whole.3 In rat models of acute, experimental diabetes, the kidney weight may increase by 10% to 15% over that seen in control mice, whereas body weight decreases by 25%. Given the ability of the kidney to grow under catabolic conditions, one would think that kidney growth would be independent of overall nutrient intake, but this is not the case. Starvation of experimental animals through either calorie or amino acid deprivation or both strongly inhibits kidney growth.4 Prevention of hypertrophy may contribute to the effect of low-protein diets to delay the progression of kidney disease. Consequently, it is important to understand how the catabolic conditions leading to kidney growth differ from the catabolic state seen in starvation. In a cell that is not growing, the rate protein synthesis is equal to the rate of protein breakdown. To acquire proteins needed for growth, a cell must increase the rate of protein synthesis and/or decrease the rate of protein breakdown. To examine how the kidney grows during acute diabetes and acidosis in rat models, investigators have measured renal protein synthesis and degradation. In acute streptozotocin-induced diabetes, protein synthesis is transiently increased at 3 days but normalizes at 7 days.5, 6 In contrast, protein breakdown decreases by 25% and remains at this level until 7 days.6 Similar results have been found in metabolic acidosis.7 It appeals to our sense of economy that during negative nitrogen balance, the kidney grows predominantly by reducing protein breakdown. This response differs from that seen during caloric starvation, when there is a marked increase in protein breakdown in the kidney. We believe that understanding the processes controlling protein breakdown provide insight into the differences between calorie starvation and the conditions that cause renal hypertrophy. Proteolysis Regulating Growth  It is easy to understand how synthesis of new proteins could produce proteins necessary for cell growth. The transcriptional and translational machinery of the cell allow exquisite control of synthesis of any required protein. It has been more difficult to understand how kidney cells could selectively reduce breakdown of only the proteins needed for growth. The classic pathway of lysosomal macroautophagy is not considered to be a highly selective system of intracellular proteolysis, because bulk, unselected cytoplasmic proteins are delivered to the harsh, acidic environment of the lysosome where proteases are activated by the low pH.8 During the past 15 years, selective pathways of protein degradation have been described. The ubiquitin-proteasome system, the most important system for destroying intracellular protein, is controlled by a large number, perhaps hundreds, of ubiquitin ligases that recognize specific proteins to be destroyed.9 By tagging targeted proteins with another small protein, ubiquitin, these ligases provide a signal allowing specific proteins to be destroyed by a second protein complex, the proteasome. In muscle, the ubiquitin proteasome system is specifically activated during many catabolic conditions.9 A specific lysosomal pathway, chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) (Fig. 1), is of particular interest because of its relationship to growth, nutrition, and kidney disease. In CMA, a protein, a heat shock cognate protein, hsc73, binds to a five amino acid sequence similar to Lys-Phe-Glu-Arg-Gln (KFERQ) on the target protein.10 Once this binding takes place, hsc73 binds to the lysosome-associated membrane protein 2a (LAMP2a) on the lysosomal membrane, which facilitates delivery of the protein into the lysosome.10 In response to stimuli that increase CMA in liver cells, LAMP2a abundance increases, especially in the lysosomal membrane.10 Overexpression of LAMP2a stimulates activity of CMA, suggesting that LAMP2a abundance is a rate-limiting step for the activity of the pathway.10 One clue that CMA may be regulated in renal hypertrophy comes from studies of metabolic acidosis.11, 12 During acidosis, the kidney increases ammonia production as a way of excreting acid. By itself, acidosis does not promote hypertrophy in cultured renal tubular cells, but ammonia does at the concentrations seen in the kidney during acidosis.11, 13 As ammonia enters lysosomes, it traps hydrogen ions, increases the pH in lysosomes, and decreases proteolytic activity of both unselective macroautophagy and selective CMA. Any inhibitor of lysosomal function, whether it works through alkalization or as a protease inhibitor, also leads to hypertrophy.11, 12 Because KFERQ-containing proteins (those destroyed by CMA) account for up to one third of total protein in kidney, suppressing lysosomal degradation would lead to the accumulation of this class of proteins.14 Many enzymes abundant in renal hypertrophy contain a KFERQ sequence. These include phosphofructokinase, glyceraldehyde 6 phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), pyruvate kinase, choline kinase, and phosphatidylcholine transferase. These glycolytic and synthetic enzymes along with transcription factors with KFERQ motifs, including c-fos and the paired box transcription factor, pax2, are abundant during growth in the kidney.6, 10, 15 Furthermore, KFERQ proteins in the kidney are selectively degraded during calorie starvation.10 Because starvation increases the activity of CMA, the observation that calorie starvation prevents the renal hypertrophy that occurs after uninephrectomy suggests that these proteins are required for renal hypertrophy.4 Although there is no direct evidence that reducing CMA is enough to make kidneys grow, studies in the cathepsin A knockout mouse suggest that too much CMA activity will prevent renal growth.16, 17 Cathepsin A knockout mice have constitutively active CMA from decreased ability to downregulate lysosomal LAMP2a.17 These mice have the same phenotype as humans with cathepsin A deletions: death from renal failure at an early age.17, 18 What about diabetes and uremia? There is no increase in ammonia production in these conditions to downregulate CMA. It is known that growth factors, including epidermal growth factor (EGF), are increased in the kidney in uremia and diabetes and that growth factors can suppress protein breakdown.19, 20 With inhibitors of lysosomal function, we examined the pathway of proteolysis regulated by EGF in primary cultures of proximal tubule cells and found that a lysosomal system was being regulated.21 To investigate whether CMA is regulated in renal hypertrophy we used a cultured renal tubular cell model (NRK-52E cells). EGF, prolonged the half-life of GAPDH protein (a classic substrate for CMA22) as much as ammonia did. EGF caused a similar increase in the half-life of the pax2 transcription factor. This increase in half-lives was accompanied by an increased accumulation of proteins with a KFERQ motif, including GAPDH, the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase and pax2. Notably, ammonia also increased the level of these proteins, including pax2. Proteins with no KFERQ sequence (e.g., hexokinase22) did not accumulate. Lysosomal import of KFERQ proteins depends on how much LAMP2a and the hsc73 are associated with the lysosome.10 We found that EGF decreased the amount of LAMP2a and hsc73 associated with lysosomes. We concluded that in cultured renal cells, EGF slows the breakdown of proteins targeted for destruction by CMA, just as ammonia does. To show that diabetes also regulates CMA, we used a pair-fed rat model of acute diabetes to be sure that there was no influence of differences in caloric or protein intake that could affect CMA.6 Lysosomal protein breakdown in the renal cortex of the diabetic animals was lower. Just as we had seen with EGF in the cell culture model, we found increases in KFERQ containing proteins, especially GAPDH and pax2.6 Moreover, lysosomes isolated from the renal cortex of the diabetic animals had less LAMP2a and hsc73 associated with them, consistent with reduced CMA.6 We concluded that diabetes reduces CMA in the kidney. Signal-Regulating Proteolysis  Growth factors activate well-defined intracellular signaling. Pathways activated by insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors have formed a paradigm for understanding regulation of cellular protein metabolism in skeletal muscle, especially the phosphatidyl-3 inositol kinase (PI 3 kinase) pathway (Fig. 2).23 In cultured hepatic carcinoma cells, addition of the phosphoinositide products of type 1 PI 3-kinase suppresses proteolysis,24 and inhibiting pentaerythritol tetranitrate, a phosphatase that inactivates type 1 PI-3 kinase, seems to specifically suppress macroautophagy in intestinal cancer cells.25 Similarly in muscle cells, we found that metabolic acidosis, a consequence of chronic kidney disease, inhibited insulin receptor substrate 1–associated PI 3-kinase and attenuated the suppression of protein degradation by insulin.26 PI 3-kinase is increased in the renal cortex during diabetic renal hypertrophy.27 We examined how EGF suppresses proteolysis in NRK-52E renal tubular cells. We first showed that growth factor tyrosine kinase receptors and the associated Ras signaling upstream of PI 3 kinase regulated protein breakdown.28 Ras activates the regulatory PI 3 kinase p85 subunit of which recruits and activates the PI 3 kinase p110 kinase subunit. We created separate adenoviruses expressing either a dominant negative p85 or constitutively active p110 subunits.28 Expressing dominant negative p85 accelerated the basal rate of proteolysis and completely eliminated the ability of EGF to suppress proteolysis. This shows that class 1 PI-3 kinase activity is required for EGF to regulate proteolysis. Transfection with this constitutively active p110 construct increased PI 3-kinase activity and Akt phosphorylation, and increased cell protein half-life by approximately 33%, suggesting that p110 activation is sufficient to regulate proteolysis. Expression of this dominant negative PI 3-kinase p85 regulatory subunit in L6 muscle cells also blunted the effect of insulin on proteolysis.26 PI 3 kinase regulated different proteolytic systems in kidney and muscle. In skeletal muscle, PI 3 kinase regulated proteasomal proteolysis, but in the kidney cells, it regulated a lysosomal system.26, 28, 29 Thus, PI 3 kinase regulated protein breakdown in both cell types but affected a different system of proteolysis in each. What are the downstream effectors of type 1 PI 3-kinase on proteolysis? Akt and regulate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are two major pathways downstream of PI 3 kinase. Akt phosphorylates and inactivates glycogen synthetase kinase and subclass O of the F Box (Forkhead) family of transcription factors, the FoxOs to regulate glucose metabolism.30 mTOR integrates nutritional signals with PI 3 kinase signaling to regulate protein synthesis by p70S6 kinase and similar pathways.31 We found that the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, seemed to partly reverse EGF-mediated suppression of phosphate dehydrogenase.29 However, neither proteasome inhibitor MG132 nor lactocystin altered the effect of EGF on proteolysis, but both prevented rapamycin from having any effect on proteolysis. This result suggests mTOR does not regulate CMA, but that mTOR mediates a separate weak effect of EGF to prevent activation of the proteasome. Because mTOR did not appear to mediate the signal-regulating CMA, we examined whether Akt was required.29 We used a dominant negative Akt1 virus in the NRK-52E cells and blocked lysosomal proteolysis with methylamine. In the presence of the lysosome inhibitor, 10 mM methylamine, dominant negative Akt1 no longer stimulated proteolysis reflecting activity of the dominant negative Akt1 on lysosomal function. By using a constitutively active Akt1, we found a decrease in phosphate dehydrogenase that was two thirds of that induced by EGF. If PI 3 kinase signaling is important for inhibiting CMA, then inhibitors of the pathway should cause depletion of KFERQ proteins, such as pax2. Confirming this expectation, expression of a dominant negative Akt1 but not the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin decreases pax2 protein. Similarly, treatment with the constitutively active Akt1 increases pax2 expression. These results suggest direct regulation of CMA by Akt1. Taken together, our results suggest that EGF regulates CMA in renal tubular cells by a pathway that includes Ras, type 1 PI 3-kinase, and Akt. What lies downstream of Akt? The forkhead family of transcription factors (the FoxOs) move to the nucleus to regulate the transcription of many metabolic genes important for surviving the unfed state.32 Akt phosphorylation of FoxOs leads to their inactivation by excluding them from the nucleus. Catabolic hormones (e.g., glucocorticoids) or conditions that interfere with IGF-1/insulin signaling in muscle decrease the phosphorylation of FoxO1 and FoxO3.33, 34 Decreased FoxO phosphorylation led to increased transcription of muscle-specific ubiquitin C3 ligases. Preliminary experiments with a constitutively active FoxO suggest a role for the FoxOs in regulation of CMA in kidney cells (W. Shen, MD, PhD, and H. Franch, MD, unpublished data, 2006). This is important because oxidative stress, which acts counter to Akt on FoxO activity and is increased in protein and calorie starvation, accelerates CMA.35 It increases FoxO activity by increasing nuclear import (by the JUN terminal kinase) and enhances FoxO transcriptional activity (by the SIRT1 protein deacetylase).36 The SIRT1 pathway is of particular interest because of its role in mediating nutritional signals. Further experiments will be needed to examine whether nutritional signals regulate CMA through FoxO signaling and whether it provides an integration point between dietary and growth factor effects on renal growth and the progression of renal disease. Conclusion  Kidneys grow and muscle atrophies in catabolic conditions such as diabetes, because of opposite activation of conserved intracellular signaling pathways. Insulin and IGF-1 resistance accelerates muscle protein breakdown through the proteasome, whereas activation of renal growth factors, such as EGF, allows accumulation of specific substrates needed for growth of the kidney. It is of interest that the PI 3 kinase signaling pathway regulates different proteolytic systems in different cell types. We hypothesize that there is a common growth factor-activated signaling pathway regulating proteolysis in epithelial and muscle cells, but divergence in downstream effectors. In evolution, such divergence occurred so that specialized cell-type specific systems of proteolysis are regulated by common signaling intermediates. Our hypothesis is that the PI 3 kinase/Akt pathway will interact with nutritional signaling pathways to regulate proteolytic systems in many clinically important conditions. Acknowledgments  The author thanks James L. Bailey, for a careful reading of the article, and all his collaborators who contributed so much to this work, including Wen Shen, Sira Sooparb, Nikia Brown, S. Russ Price, J. Fred Dice, Patrick Finn, Xiaonan Wang, Terry Unterman, and William Mitch. References  1. 1Ahuja TS, Mitch WE. Protein catabolism in chronic uremia: is it due to malnutrition?. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2004;52:326–331. 2. 2Belfiore F, Razbuazzo AM, Iannello S, Campione R, Vasta D. Anabolic response of some tissues to diabetes. Biochem Med Metab Biol. 1986;35:149–155. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
3. 3Franch HA. Pathways of proteolysis affecting renal cell growth. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2002;11:445–450. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
4. 4Kobayashi S, Venkatashalam MA. Differential effects of calorie restriction on glomeruli and tubules of the remnant kidney. Kidney Int. 1992;42:710–717. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
5. 5Seyer-Hansen K. Renal hypertrophy in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1976;51:551–555. 6. 6Sooparb S, Price SR, Shaoguang J, Franch HA. Suppression of chaperone-mediated autophagy in the renal cortex during acute diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int. 2004;65:2135–2144. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
7. 7Bignall MC, Elebute O, Lotspeich WD. Renal protein and ammonia biochemistry in NH4Cl acidosis and after uninephrectomy. Am J Physiol. 1968;215:289–295. MEDLINE 8. 8Shintani T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy in health and disease: a double-edged sword. Sci. 2004;306:990–995. 9. 9Mitch WE, Goldberg AL. Mechanisms of muscle wasting: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1897–1905. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
10. 10Majeski AE, Dice JF. Mechanisms of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:2435–2444. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
11. 11Franch HA, Preisig PA. NH4Cl induced hypertrophy is mediated by weak base effects and is independent of cell cycle processes. Am J Physiol (Cell). 1996;270:C932–C938. 12. 12Franch HA. Modification of the epidermal growth factor response by ammonia in renal cell hypertrophy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:1631–1638. MEDLINE 13. 13Tovbin D, Franch HA, Alpern RJ, Preisig PA. Media acidification inhibits TGF beta-mediated growth suppression in cultured rabbit proximal tubule cells. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1997;109:572–579. 14. 14Chiang HL, Dice JF. Peptide sequences that target proteins for enhanced degradation during serum withdrawal. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:6797–6805. MEDLINE 15. 15Franch HA, Sooparb S, Du J. A mechanism regulating proteolysis of specific proteins during renal tubular cell hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:19126–19131. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
16. 16Cuervo AM, Dice JF. Unique properties of lamp2a compared to other lamp2 isoforms. J Cell Science. 2000;113:4441–4450. 17. 17Cuervo AM, Mann L, Bonten EJ, d’Azzo A, Dice JF. Cathepsin A regulates chaperone-mediated autophagy through cleavage of the lysosomal receptor. EMBO J. 2003;22:47–59. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
18. 18Rottier RJ, Hahn CN, Mann LW, et al. Lack of PPCA expression only partially coincides with lysosomal storage in galactosialidosis mice: indirect evidence for spatial requirement of the catalytic rather than the protective function of PPCA. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:1787–1794. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
19. 19Ballard FJ, Knowles SE, Wong SSC, Bodner JB, Wood CM, Gunn JM. Inhibition of protein breakdown in cultured cells is a consistent response to growth factors. FEBS Lett. 1980;114:209–212. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
20. 20Harris RC, Chung E, Coffey RJ. EGF receptor ligands. Exp Cell Res. 2003;284:2–13. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
21. 21Franch HA, Curtis PV, Mitch WE. Mechanisms of renal tubular cell hypertrophy: mitogen-induced suppression of proteolysis. Am J Physiol (Cell Physiology). 1997;273:C843–C851. 22. 22Aniento F, Roche E, Cuervo AM, Knecht E. Uptake and degradation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase by rat liver lysosomes. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:10463–10470. MEDLINE 23. 23Franch HA, Price SR. Molecular signaling pathways regulating muscle proteolysis during atrophy. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:271–275. MEDLINE 24. 24Petiot A, Ogier-Denis E, Blommaart EFC, Meijer AJ, Codogno P. Distinct classes of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinases are involved in signaling pathways that control macroautophagy in HT-29 cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:992–998. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
25. 25Arico S, Petiot A, Bauvy C, et al. The tumor suppressor PTEN positively regulates macroautophagy by inhibiting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:35243–35246. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
26. 26Franch HA, Raissi S, Wang X, Zheng B, Bailey JL, Price SR. Acidosis impairs insulin receptor substrate-1-associated phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling in muscle cells: consequences on proteolysis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004;287:F700–F706. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
27. 27Feliers D, Duraisamy S, Faulkner JL, et al. Activation of renal signaling pathways in db/db mice with type 2 diabetes. Kidney Int. 2001;60:495–504. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
28. 28Franch HA, Wang X, Sooparb S, Brown NS, Du J. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity is required for epidermal growth factor to suppress proteolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:903–908. MEDLINE 29. 29Shen W, Brown NS, Finn PF, Dice JF, Franch HA. Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin regulate separate systems of proteolysis in renal tubular cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2414–2423. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
30. 30Jope RS, Johnson GV. The glamour and gloom of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004;29:95–102. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
31. 31Vanhaesebroeck B, Waterfield MD. Signaling by distinct classes of phosphoinositide 3-kinases. Exp Cell Res. 1999;253:239–254. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
32. 32Arden KC, Fox O. linking new signaling pathways. Mol Cell. 2004;14:416–418. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
33. 33Stitt TN, Drujan D, Clarke BA, et al. The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway prevents expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Mol Cell. 2004;14:395–403. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
34. 34Sandri M, Sandri C, Gilbert A, et al. FoxO transcription factors induce the atrophy-related ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 and cause skeletal muscle atrophy. Cell. 2004;117:399–412. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
35. 35Kiffin R, Christian C, Knecht E, Cuervo AM. Activation of chaperone-mediated autophagy during oxidative stress. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:4829–4840. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
36. 36Vogt PK, Jiang H, Aoki M. Triple layer control: phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination of FOXO proteins. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:908–913. ⁎ Research Service, Atlanta Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia. † Renal Division, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Address reprint requests to Harold A. Franch, MD, Renal Division, Emory University School of Medicine, WMB, Room 338, 1639 Pierce Drive NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.
This work reviewed here was made possible by a Merit Review Award from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. PII: S1051-2276(07)00004-0 doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2007.01.018 © 2007 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved. | |
|