Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 343-349, September 2007

Serum Levels of Folate and Cobalamin Are Lower in Depressed Than in Nondepressed Hemodialysis Subjects

  • Louise Clement, MS, RD, LD, CSR

      Affiliations

    • South Plains Kidney Disease Center, Lubbock, Texas.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Louise Clement, MS, RD, LD, CSR, South Plains Kidney Disease Center, 1607 W. Loop 289, Lubbock, TX 79416.
  • ,
  • Mallory Boylan, PhD, RD, LD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition, Hospitality, and Retailing, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.
  • ,
  • Virginia G. Miller, PhD, RN, CS, FNP

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
  • ,
  • Mary Rockwell, RD, LD, CSR

      Affiliations

    • Dialysis Center of Lubbock, Lubbock, Texas.
  • ,
  • Kendra Allred, MS, RD, LD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition, Hospitality, and Retailing, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if there was a significant difference in serum and RBC folate or serum cobalamin levels in depressed and nondepressed subjects on hemodialysis (HD).

Design

A cross-sectional design was used in this study. Each subject’s serum folate and cobalamin, and red blood cell (RBC) folate were measured. The Beck Depression Index II (BDI-II) was used to assess for depression. Subjects with scores of 10 or greater were considered depressed. Other laboratory, anthropometric, and demographic data were obtained from the subjects’ medical records. To assess for significant differences (P < 0.05) in the laboratory values of the outcome variables between depressed and nondepressed subjects, t tests were performed on the groups’ mean values.

Setting

The study was conducted with patients in two dialysis centers in Texas.

Patients or Other Participants

Seventy-three individuals undergoing HD for at least six months who met study inclusion criteria were solicited to participate in the study after the study was approved by the respective institutional review board.

Intervention

Depression and mental status of each subject were assessed using the BDI-II and the Folstein Mini-Mental State Exam, respectively.

Main Outcome Measure

Serum folate, cobalamin, total homocysteine, and RBC folate were measured and mean values were evaluated for significant differences in the depressed and nondepressed groups.

Results

Of the subjects in this study, 43.8% had BDI-II scores > 10 indicating depression. The nondepressed subjects had significantly higher mean serum folate (281 ± 649 vs. 52 ± 137 ng/mL), serum cobalamin (1162 ± 1014 vs. 757 ± 463 pg/mL), and RBC folate (1433 ± 1757 vs. 810 ± 654 ng/mL) levels than did depressed subjects. In the nondepressed group, 39% of subjects were taking a supplement containing 35–42 mg folacin and 7 mg cobalamin per week while only 9.1% of depressed subjects were taking a vitamin containing these levels of B vitamins. The group means were not significantly different for age, months on HD, body mass index, erythropoietin/kg body weight, total homocysteine, hemoglobin, albumin, or ferritin.

Conclusion

As with the general population, lower serum folate, RBC folate, and serum cobalamin levels were found in depressed as compared to nondepressed subjects on HD. Plasma levels of these vitamins may be one of many factors related to depression, but larger studies with stronger designs are needed to confirm the results of this study.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was supported by a grant from the National Kidney Foundation Council on Renal Nutrition.

PII: S1051-2276(07)00116-1

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2007.05.007

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 17, Issue 5 , Pages 343-349, September 2007