Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 18, Issue 5 , Pages 424-429, September 2008

Association Between Body Mass Index and Body Fat in Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3 to 5, Hemodialysis, and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

  • Cyntia Leinig, RD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Cyntia Erthal Leinig, RD, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Rua Imaculada Conceição 1155, Curitiba, Paraná 80215, Brazil.
  • ,
  • Roberto Pecoits-Filho, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
    • ProRenal Foundation, Curitiba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Marcelo Mazza Nascimento, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • ProRenal Foundation, Curitiba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Simone Gonçalves, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
    • ProRenal Foundation, Curitiba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Miguel Carlos Riella, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
    • ProRenal Foundation, Curitiba, Brazil
  • ,
  • Cristina Martins, RD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Health and Biological Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
    • ProRenal Foundation, Curitiba, Brazil

Objective

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients may present with altered body composition. Body mass index (BMI) is a simple method for evaluating body fat mass (FM) in the general population. In CKD patients, there are few reports demonstrating the association between BMI and body composition. Our objective was to investigate the reliability of BMI as an indicator of FM in patients with CKD stages 3 to 5.

Methods

Seventy-eight nondiabetic CKD patients (aged 48, SD ± 12 years; 45% male) and 30 healthy control subjects (aged 46, SD ± 12 years; 40% male), matched for age and sex, were evaluated. Chronic kidney disease patients were divided, according to K/DOQI guidelines, into 27 subjects at stages 3 to 4 (mean glomerular filtration rate of 43 ± 12 mL/minute; age, 52 ± 10 years), and 51 at stage 5: 25 in hemodialysis (HD) (aged 45, SD ± 12 years; 44% male), and 26 in peritoneal dialysis (PD) (aged 49, SD ± 13 years; 42% male). Body mass index was calculated as weight/height2, and body composition was evaluated through dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Results

There was no difference in median BMI (kg/m2) among healthy control subjects (24.8; range, 19.2–34.1), CKD stages 3 to 4 (26.4; range, 20.4–37.6), HD patients (24.5; range, 19.4–35.7), and PD patients (24.5; range, 20.2–37.7; P > .05). Likewise, no significant difference was verified in median body FM (kg) among control subjects (18.8; range, 9.2–36.5), CKD stages 3 to 4 (21.2; range, 11.6–37.9), HD patients (17.1; range, 4.8–38.9), and PD patients (20.1; range, 6.5–41.5; P > .05). Moreover, a positive and significant correlation was found between BMI and FM (kg) in CKD stages 3 to 4 (Rho = 0.67, P = .0002), in HD patients (Rho = 0.67, P = .0002), in PD patients (Rho = 0.79, P < .0001), and in control subjects (Rho = 0.79, P < .0001). Although BMI and lean body mass (in kg) was significantly correlated in CKD stages 3 to 4 (Rho = 0.58, P = .001) and healthy control subjects (Rho = 0.30, P = .007), no significant correlation was found in HD patients (Rho = 0.19, P = .34) and in PD patients (Rho = 0.17, P = .38).

Conclusions

Body composition did not differ in patients with CKD stages 3 to 5, and between dialysis modalities. Although BMI was strongly and significantly correlated with body FM in CKD patients at stages 3 to 5, lean body mass was not. These findings suggest that BMI is a reliable indicator of body FM in this CKD population.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1051-2276(08)00284-7

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2008.04.001

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 18, Issue 5 , Pages 424-429, September 2008