Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 19, Issue 5 , Pages 412-421, September 2009

Oral Protein Supplementation Alone Improves Anabolism in a Dose-Dependent Manner in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

  • Mary B. Sundell, RD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Kerri L. Cavanaugh, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Pingsheng Wu, PhD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Ayumi Shintani, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Raymond M. Hakim, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
    • Fresenius Medical Care of North America, Waltham, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • T. Alp Ikizler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to T. Alp Ikizler, MD, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. South and Garland, S-3223 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2372.

published online 05 June 2009.

Objective

We examined the protein anabolic effects of Pro-Stat 64, a high nitrogen-containing, enzyme-hydrolyzed, tryptophan-fortified, collagen protein supplement administrated during hemodialysis, at two different dosing regimens.

Design

This was a randomized, controlled, prospective study with 3 different groups: control, single dose of supplementation, and double dose of supplementation.

Setting

This study was performed at a clinical research center.

Patients

Six prevalent chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients were enrolled: 5 males, 1 female, 4 African Americans, and 2 Caucasians. Their mean age was 45 ± 11 years (S.D.). Two patients were diabetic.

Methods

Protein turnover studies were performed using amino-acid (AA) balance and primed constant infusion of L-(1-13C) leucine.

Main Outcome Measure

Whole-body protein balance was determined according to substrate kinetics.

Results

There were no statistically significant difference at any time point between protocols for blood chemistries and hormonal markers, except for minor variations in plasma glucose. All plasma AA groups displayed decreases during a control study, in which no supplementation was given. Compared with the control group, plasma nonessential AA and total AA concentrations were statistically significantly higher during HD after both single and double doses of supplementation. The forearm arteriovenous AA balance was statistically significantly better for essential, nonessential, and total AA uptake after both single-dose and double-dose supplementation compared with the control group, except for nonessential AA, which was significantly better only after a double dose. Whole-body protein breakdown and net protein balance were statistically significantly better during HD with a double-dose administration in a dose-dependent manner, compared with the control and single-dose groups.

Conclusions

Oral AA supplementation alone improves whole-body and skeletal muscle protein anabolism in a dose-dependent manner in chronic HD patients. These data should be taken into account during clinical decision-making or when designing clinical trials of nutritional supplementation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants R01-DK45604 and K24-DK62849, by Diabetes Research Training Center Grant DK-20593 from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, by grant UL1 RR024975 from the National Center for Research Resources, and by an unrestricted grant from Medical Nutrition USA, Inc. M.B.S. is supported in part by a grant from the National Kidney Foundation Council of Renal Nutrition. K.L.C. is supported by grant K23 K23-DK080952 from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

 The authors declare no conflict of interest with regard to involvement with the commercial entities that supplied nutritional supplements.

PII: S1051-2276(09)00041-7

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2009.01.019

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 19, Issue 5 , Pages 412-421, September 2009