Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 275-282, July 2009

Malnutrition, Anthropometric, and Biochemical Abnormalities in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy

  • S. Mahaboob Khan, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biochemistry, Government Home Science College, Chandigarh, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Mahaboob Khan S., Department of Biochemistry, Government Home Science College, Sector 10 D, Chandigarh 160 010, India.
  • ,
  • Sandhu Chandanpreet, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biochemistry, Government Home Science College, Chandigarh, India
  • ,
  • Krishan Kewal, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
  • ,
  • D'Cruz Sanjay, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
  • ,
  • Kashyap Jeet Ram, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
  • ,
  • Sachdeva Atul, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India

Objective

Malnutrition is widely prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease. Our primary objective was to assess the utility of subjective global assessment (SGA) as an indicator of malnutrition in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Design

This pilot study evaluated the extent of malnutrition, using a combination of SGA, anthropometric, and biochemical parameters.

Setting

Malnutrition, although commonly noticed in patients during routine clinical observation of diabetic nephropathy patients, has not been estimated. Moreover, there is no single “gold standard” method to identify malnutrition.

Patients

The SGA method was performed to evaluate nutritional status in 40 patients with diabetic nephropathy (23 men and 17 women) examined consecutively in the out patient department of Government Medical College and Hospital (Chandigarh, India). Patients with kidney disease not attributable to diabetes, and with conditions leading to acute morbidity such as infections, elevated body temperature, respiratory and gastrointestinal distress, or wounds, were excluded.

Main Outcome Measures

Anthropometric parameters such as body mass index, triceps skinfold (TSF), biceps skinfold (BSF), midarm circumference (MAC), and midarm muscle circumference (MAMC), along with biochemical parameters such as hemoglobin, fasting blood sugar, serum albumin, and lipid profile, were measured.

Results

Malnutrition was identified in 63% of patients: mild to moderate in 48%, and severe in 15%. The measured parameters showed no significant gender-based differences. In SGA grade C patients (severely malnourished), TSF, MAC, and MAMC were significantly reduced. Biochemical parameters did not show any significant change across nutritional grades, except for hemoglobin, which showed a significant reduction with advanced malnutrition.

Conclusions

Nutritional status as determined by SGA is a useful and reliable index for identifying patients at risk for malnutrition. Our data confirm that a high degree of malnutrition was prevalent in patients with diabetic nephropathy, as shown by anthropometric and biochemical variables. Therefore, we suggest that these parameters be integrated in regular assessment to determine malnutrition.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1051-2276(09)00048-X

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2009.01.026

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 275-282, July 2009