Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 188-195, March 2011

Self-Management and Biomedical Outcomes of a Cooking, and Exercise Program for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

  • Mary Flesher, RD, RN, BSN, MA

      Affiliations

    • Richmond Health Services, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Mary Flesher, RD, RN, BSN, MA, Richmond Health Services, 7000 Westminster Highway, Richmond, BC, Canada V6X 1A2.
  • ,
  • Paula Woo, RD, BSc (Dietetics)

      Affiliations

    • Richmond Health Services, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • Anthony Chiu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Richmond Health Services, Vancouver Coastal Health and Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • Ashley Charlebois, RD, BSc (Dietetics), MSc, CEP

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Experimental Medicine Program, Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • Darren E.R. Warburton, PhD, CEP

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Experimental Medicine Program, Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • Barbara Leslie, RD, BSc (Dietetics)

      Affiliations

    • HealthLinks British Columbia, Nutrition Services, British Columbia, Canada

published online 22 July 2010.

Background

Limited research has been done on integrating cooking and exercise classes into the routine care of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The main purpose of the research was to determine whether the addition of these services would slow the progression of certain CKD parameters.

Methods

The study evaluated 5 endpoints, at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months: urinary protein, blood pressure, urinary sodium, glomerular filtration rate, and total cholesterol between 2 groups (control group receiving CKD standard care and experimental group receiving standard care plus cooking and exercise classes). Eighty percent of the experimental group was hypothesized to improve in 4 out of the 5 endpoints versus ≤50% in the control group with a P-value of 0.05. An overall difference of 30% was anticipated between the 2 groups. The research also compared self-efficacy and health status outcomes using a self-management questionnaire.

Results

Forty randomly assigned patients participated in the study (17 controls and 23 experimental). In the control group, 2 of 17 people improved in at least 4 of the 5 endpoints. In the experimental group, 14 of 23 people improved in at least 4 of the 5 endpoints.

Conclusions

Sixty-one percent of experimental subjects showed improvements in 4 of 5 endpoints, showing a significant difference overall when compared with the control group (12% improved in 4 out of 5 endpoints). In looking at the trend in qualitative measures from the comparison of the self-management questionnaire, the overall trend showed more improved answers with the experimental group versus the control group.

 

 The only financial support for this study came from $1500 grant from the Vancouver Coastal Health Professional Research Award 2008.

 The manuscript has been seen and approved by all authors and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in a similar form, or language.

PII: S1051-2276(10)00080-4

doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2010.03.009

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 188-195, March 2011