Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 217-221, October 1996

The effect of improved dialytic efficiency on measures of appetite in peritoneal dialysis patients

  • Nancy Ginsberg, RD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Nancy S. Ginsberg, MS,RD, Baumritter Kidney Center, 1325 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461.
    • Baumritter Kidney Center, New York Dialysis Management, Division of Nephrology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • ,
  • Steven Fishbane, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
  • ,
  • Robert I Lynn, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nephrology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of increasing urea clearance on measures of appetite and protein intake in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Parameters evaluated included serum albumin normal protein catabolic rate (nPCR), visual analog scales, and tests meals monitored by a computerized system VIKTOR. Patients were studied at baseline, then at 2 months after their peritoneal dialysis (PD) regimens were intensified to increase their weekly to twice their baseline value or 3.0 (phase II), and then 2 months after being returned to their initial PD regimen (phase III). Ten patients completed follow-up. The mean at baseline, phase II, and III were 1.74 ± .11, 2.81 ± .26, and 1.85 ± .15 (P < .0001). The mean nPCR was .85 ± .06 g/kg/d at baseline, 1.08 ± .09 g/kg/d in phase II, 0.85 ± .04 g/kg/d in phase III (P = .001). The mean serum albumin was 3.89 ± .15 g/dL at baseline, 4.07 ± .17 g/dL after phase II, and 3.93 ± 0.16 g/dL after phase III (P > .05). Parameters of appetite measured by the monitored test meals and visual analog scores showed no changes over the study period. We have found that improving urea clearance in PD patients led to an increase in protein intake as measured by nPCR, but no change in specific measures of appetite.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by a grant from the National Kidney Foundation, Council of Renal Nutrition.

PII: S1051-2276(96)90069-2

Journal of Renal Nutrition
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 217-221, October 1996